issues_with_research_readings

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
issues_with_research_readings [2018/02/22 04:15]
filination
issues_with_research_readings [2018/08/05 20:05] (current)
filination
Line 24: Line 24:
   * [[http://​www.smh.com.au/​national/​health/​psychology-in-crisis-as-seminal-studies-are-unable-to-be-replicated-20170530-gwg9xh.html|Psychology in crisis as seminal studies are unable to be replicated]] (Sydney morning herald, 2017)   * [[http://​www.smh.com.au/​national/​health/​psychology-in-crisis-as-seminal-studies-are-unable-to-be-replicated-20170530-gwg9xh.html|Psychology in crisis as seminal studies are unable to be replicated]] (Sydney morning herald, 2017)
   * [[https://​thewire.in/​208014/​replication-crisis-science/​|The Replication Crisis in Science]] (The Wire, 2017)   * [[https://​thewire.in/​208014/​replication-crisis-science/​|The Replication Crisis in Science]] (The Wire, 2017)
 +  * [[http://​www.slate.com/​articles/​health_and_science/​science/​2014/​07/​replication_controversy_in_psychology_bullying_file_drawer_effect_blog_posts.html|Why Psychologists’ Food Fight Matters]] (Slate, 2018)
  
 Great summaries: Great summaries:
Line 108: Line 109:
   * [[http://​onlinelibrary.wiley.com/​doi/​10.1111/​ecoj.12527/​abstract?​campaign=woletoc|To Replicate or Not To Replicate? Exploring Reproducibility in Economics through the Lens of a Model and a Pilot Study]] (The Economic Journal, 2017)   * [[http://​onlinelibrary.wiley.com/​doi/​10.1111/​ecoj.12527/​abstract?​campaign=woletoc|To Replicate or Not To Replicate? Exploring Reproducibility in Economics through the Lens of a Model and a Pilot Study]] (The Economic Journal, 2017)
   * [[https://​www.bloomberg.com/​view/​articles/​2017-11-27/​the-economics-data-revolution-has-growing-pains|The Economics Data Revolution Has Growing Pains Too many studies use small sample sizes that give false positives]] (Bloomberg, 2017)   * [[https://​www.bloomberg.com/​view/​articles/​2017-11-27/​the-economics-data-revolution-has-growing-pains|The Economics Data Revolution Has Growing Pains Too many studies use small sample sizes that give false positives]] (Bloomberg, 2017)
 +  * [[http://​www.pnas.org/​content/​early/​2018/​03/​08/​1802324115|Reproducibility of research: Issues and proposed remedies]] (PNAS, 2018) SPECIAL ISSUE
  
  
Line 113: Line 115:
   * [[http://​journals.plos.org/​plosone/​article?​id=10.1371/​journal.pone.0175635|Questionable science and reproducibility in electrical brain stimulation research]] (PLOSone, 2017)   * [[http://​journals.plos.org/​plosone/​article?​id=10.1371/​journal.pone.0175635|Questionable science and reproducibility in electrical brain stimulation research]] (PLOSone, 2017)
   * [[http://​journals.sagepub.com.sci-hub.cc/​doi/​abs/​10.1177/​1476127017701076|Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings]] (Strategic Organization,​ 2017)   * [[http://​journals.sagepub.com.sci-hub.cc/​doi/​abs/​10.1177/​1476127017701076|Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings]] (Strategic Organization,​ 2017)
 +  * [[https://​www.the-scientist.com/​features/​replication-failures-highlight-biases-in-ecology-and-evolution-science-64475#​.W2R8S_JdBdk.twitter|Replication Failures Highlight Biases in Ecology and Evolution Science]]
  
  
Line 160: Line 163:
   * [[https://​peerj.com/​preprints/​3486/​|Fallibility in science: Responding to errors in the work of oneself and others]] (preprint, Peerj, 2017)   * [[https://​peerj.com/​preprints/​3486/​|Fallibility in science: Responding to errors in the work of oneself and others]] (preprint, Peerj, 2017)
  
 +===== Data availability =====
 +
 +  * [[https://​osf.io/​preprints/​bitss/​39cfb/​|Data availability,​ reusability,​ and analytic reproducibility:​ Evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition]] (preprint, 2018)
 +  * [[http://​journals.plos.org/​plosone/​article?​id=10.1371/​journal.pone.0201856|Populating the Data Ark: An attempt to retrieve, preserve, and liberate data from the most highly-cited psychology and psychiatry articles]] (PLOSOne, 2018)
  
 ====== Summary presentations ====== ====== Summary presentations ======
Line 187: Line 194:
   * [[https://​faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/​wp-content/​uploads/​2016/​12/​Guidelines-for-science-389-Clean.pdf|Guidelines for Science:​Evidence and Checklists]] (working paper, look for the final version when it's out)   * [[https://​faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/​wp-content/​uploads/​2016/​12/​Guidelines-for-science-389-Clean.pdf|Guidelines for Science:​Evidence and Checklists]] (working paper, look for the final version when it's out)
   * [[https://​www.nature.com/​articles/​d41586-017-07522-z|Five ways to fix statistics]]   * [[https://​www.nature.com/​articles/​d41586-017-07522-z|Five ways to fix statistics]]
 +  * [[https://​psyarxiv.com/​rtygm|A practical guide for transparency in psychological science]]
  
 Initiatives:​ Initiatives:​
Line 201: Line 209:
   * [[http://​journals.sagepub.com/​doi/​abs/​10.1177/​1745691614549257|Analytic Review as a Solution to the Misreporting of Statistical Results in Psychological Science]] (PPS, 2014)   * [[http://​journals.sagepub.com/​doi/​abs/​10.1177/​1745691614549257|Analytic Review as a Solution to the Misreporting of Statistical Results in Psychological Science]] (PPS, 2014)
   * [[https://​psyarxiv.com/​fuzkh|Verify Original Results through Reanalysis before Replicating]] (reply to BBS, 2018)   * [[https://​psyarxiv.com/​fuzkh|Verify Original Results through Reanalysis before Replicating]] (reply to BBS, 2018)
 +  * [[https://​psyarxiv.com/​6ka9z|Psychological Science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive behavioural measurements]] (preprint, 2018)
  
  
Line 218: Line 227:
   * [[https://​osf.io/​preprints/​psyarxiv/​fcxge/​|Benefits of Open and High-Powered Research Outweigh Costs]] (JPSP, 2017)   * [[https://​osf.io/​preprints/​psyarxiv/​fcxge/​|Benefits of Open and High-Powered Research Outweigh Costs]] (JPSP, 2017)
   * [[https://​osf.io/​preprints/​psyarxiv/​nnkg9|Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies with Significant and Non-Significant Findings Are Probably True]] (Lakens & Etz, 2017)   * [[https://​osf.io/​preprints/​psyarxiv/​nnkg9|Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies with Significant and Non-Significant Findings Are Probably True]] (Lakens & Etz, 2017)
 +    * something similar - The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles ([[https://​www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​pubmed/​22924598|article]] / [[https://​replicationindex.wordpress.com/​2018/​02/​18/​why-most-multiple-study-articles-are-false-an-introduction-to-the-magic-index/​|blog post]])
   * [[http://​deevybee.blogspot.com/​2017/​05/​reproducible-practices-are-future-for.html|Reproducible practices are the future for early career researchers]] (Bishopblog)   * [[http://​deevybee.blogspot.com/​2017/​05/​reproducible-practices-are-future-for.html|Reproducible practices are the future for early career researchers]] (Bishopblog)
   * [[https://​www.nature.com/​articles/​s41559-017-0160|Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools]] (nature ecology & evolution, 2017)   * [[https://​www.nature.com/​articles/​s41559-017-0160|Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools]] (nature ecology & evolution, 2017)
Line 263: Line 273:
   * [[http://​willgervais.com/​blog/​2017/​3/​2/​post-publication-peer-review|Post publication peer review 2017 - Will Gervais on his own Science article]]   * [[http://​willgervais.com/​blog/​2017/​3/​2/​post-publication-peer-review|Post publication peer review 2017 - Will Gervais on his own Science article]]
   * [[https://​www.researchgate.net/​publication/​278082978_The_Replication_Paradox_Combining_Studies_can_Decrease_Accuracy_of_Effect_Size_Estimates|The Replication Paradox: Combining Studies can Decrease Accuracy of Effect Size Estimates]] (Review of General Psychology,​2015)   * [[https://​www.researchgate.net/​publication/​278082978_The_Replication_Paradox_Combining_Studies_can_Decrease_Accuracy_of_Effect_Size_Estimates|The Replication Paradox: Combining Studies can Decrease Accuracy of Effect Size Estimates]] (Review of General Psychology,​2015)
 +  * [[https://​www.nature.com/​articles/​d41586-018-02108-9|How to make replication the norm]] (Nature, 2018)
  
 Satire: Satire:
  • issues_with_research_readings.1519298102.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2018/02/22 04:15
  • by filination