Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— |
job_performance_scale [2013/12/30 21:25] (current) filination created |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Job performance self-rating scale ====== | ||
+ | I only use this measure as a complement to real objective measures. Top journals for not stand for this measure as a sole indicator. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Described in my thesis : | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | Job Performance. Job performance will include two measures - objective and self-reported job performance. [...] To complement the objective measure, participants will also be asked to indicate their own performance by indicating their own approval rate, number of tasks and to rate performance on a job performance scale (Pruden & Reese, 1972) regarding their MTurk work, subjectively comparing themselves to other workers on MTurk on quality, meeting expectations and speed (from 1 = Below Average - Below 25% ; 2 = About Average – Better than 25% ; 3 = Above Average – Better than 50% ; 4 = Near the top – Better than 75% ; 5 = The best - Better than 90%). Several studies have shown support for self assessments and self rating as a reliable measure of objective performance (Anderson, Warner, & Spencer, 1984 ; Fox & Dinur, 1988). | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some use the following scale : | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | (1 = Bottom 40% ; 2 = Average ; 3 = Upper 40% ; 4 = Top 20% ; 5 = Top 10% ; 6 = Top 5%) | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== The scale ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ran the following on MTurk for workers to evaluate themselves. | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | How would you rate your work compared to others in terms of : | ||
+ | - Quality of the end result | ||
+ | - Meeting expectations in the task | ||
+ | - Speed | ||
+ | - Value per money paid | ||
+ | </blockquote> |